Rajesh and Muzaffar read an article. It showed that no democracy has ever gone to war with another democracy. Wars take place only when one of the two governments is non-democratic. The article said that this was a great merit of democracy. After reading the essay, Rajesh and Muzaffar had different reactions. Rajesh said that this was not a good argument for democracy. It was just a matter of chance. It is possible that in the future democracies may have wars. Muzaffar said that it could not be a matter of chance. Democracies take decisions in such a way that it reduces the chances of war. Which of the two positions do you agree with and why?
To some extent, I agree with the argument of Muzaffar. In a democracy, decisions are made after discussions and keeping in mind the welfare of the people. So, in a democracy, the chances of war are minimized but doesn't completely eradicate the chances. For example, some wars happened between the two democracies of India and Pakistan.
CBSE Class 10 Sample PapersMaths StandardMaths BasicHindi AHindi BSocial ScienceScienceSanskritEnglish