
Power sharing is a foundational concept in political science, emphasising how democratic nations handle the division of power to ensure stability, protect diverse interests, and avoid conflicts. In Chapter 1 of the Class 10 Civics NCERT book, Power Sharing, we explore how various forms of power sharing promote social harmony, peace, and stability within a country.
Let’s get into this chapter's key ideas and examples, made to support students in understanding these complex ideas effectively. The class 10 civics chapter 1 notes, question banks, and other study materials are curated to help students understand concepts clearly, regardless of their learning style.
Notes PDF
<cta2>Download<cta2>
CBSE Class 10 Power Sharing Notes
Below contains links to downloadable PDFs for Class 10 Civics Chapter 1 notes, categorized according to each question typology.
Important Notes from Civics Chapter 1 Power Sharing
Power sharing in democracy is based on the belief that people in any society have diverse preferences and identities. Acknowledging these differences and giving them a voice in governance helps prevent conflicts and ensures peaceful coexistence. In a democracy, people’s voices are valued, which necessitates a power-sharing mechanism to maintain unity in diversity.
Reasons for Power Sharing
Two main reasons support the need for power sharing:
- Prudential Reasons: Power sharing helps reduce conflicts between social groups, ensuring political stability and harmony.
- Moral Reasons: Power sharing is an ideal of democratic governance, where citizens participate in decision-making directly or through elected representatives.
Case Studies: Belgium and Sri Lanka
The chapter presents two countries with distinct approaches to managing ethnic diversity: Belgium and Sri Lanka. These examples highlight both successful and unsuccessful outcomes of different power-sharing models.
Belgium: A Model of Accommodation
Belgium is a small European country with a diverse population. The country has three main communities:
- Dutch-speaking Flemish: approximately 19% of the population, mainly in the northern region of Flanders.
- French-speaking Walloons: About 40% of the population, concentrated in the southern Wallonia region.
- German-speaking community: Makes up about 1% of the population in the eastern region.
Due to ethnic diversity, Belgium faced tensions between Dutch and French-speaking communities. To manage these conflicts, Belgium adopted several power-sharing arrangements:
- Equal Representation in Government: Both Dutch and French-speaking communities have an equal number of ministers in the central government, preventing any one group from overpowering the other.
- State and Community Governments: Apart from the central government, each community (Dutch, French, and German) has its own government to oversee matters specific to their language and culture.
- Brussels Arrangement: In Brussels, a bilingual region, separate governments manage different community matters to respect both groups' interests.
- Community Governments: These governments handle education, culture, and language issues within each community.
The Belgian model is a successful example of how diverse communities can coexist peacefully, thanks to prudent power-sharing arrangements.
Sri Lanka: A Majoritarian Approach
Sri Lanka provides a contrasting example. In this island nation, two main ethnic communities exist:
- Sinhalese make up about 74% of the population, primarily practicing Buddhism.
- Tamils: Constitute around 18% of the population, with a majority being Hindu.
After gaining independence in 1948, the Sri Lankan government adopted policies favouring the Sinhalese majority, such as:
Sinhala as the Official Language: In 1916, Sinhala was made the official language, disregarding Tamil interests.
Preference in Jobs and Education: Sinhalese received preferential treatment, sidelining the Tamil community in government jobs and educational opportunities.
The lack of power sharing and the majoritarian approach led to tensions and ultimately a civil war between the Tamil minority and the Sinhalese government. Sri Lanka’s example shows how neglecting power-sharing arrangements can result in conflict and instability.
Forms of Power Sharing
This chapter also examines different forms of power sharing commonly seen in democracies:
- Horizontal Power Sharing: Here, power is distributed among different branches of government, such as the executive, legislature, and judiciary. Each branch operates independently, providing a system of checks and balances to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. For example, in India, the judiciary can review laws passed by the legislature, and the executive enforces these laws.
- Vertical Power Sharing: Power is divided across various levels of government, such as central, state, and local governments. This arrangement is also known as federalism. Each level of government has specific powers and responsibilities, allowing regional governments to address local needs.
- Power Sharing Among Social Groups: Power can also be shared among different social or ethnic groups. This form of power sharing provides representation to minority groups, as seen in Belgium, where community governments protect the interests of linguistic minorities.
- Power Sharing Among Political Parties and Pressure Groups: In democracies, power is shared among multiple political parties to ensure no single party monopolises power. Coalition governments and alliance politics often exemplify this form of power sharing. Additionally, pressure groups and interest groups influence government decisions, making governance more inclusive.
Advantages of Power Sharing
Power sharing offers several benefits for democratic governance:
- Conflict Prevention: By giving representation to diverse groups, power sharing reduces social conflicts and fosters unity.
- Political Stability: Equitable power sharing helps avoid political turmoil, as people feel included in the governance process.
- Democratic Participation: Power sharing strengthens democracy by allowing citizens to participate in decision-making, either directly or indirectly.
- Better Governance: Shared power ensures that no single branch or group has unchecked authority, leading to more balanced and accountable governance.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Here are some silly mistakes that students often make during board exam prep.
Ignoring the Concept of Power Sharing
- Many students focus only on examples (Belgium and Sri Lanka) and ignore the core idea of power sharing.
- Tip: Understand why power sharing is important in a democracy and how it prevents conflicts.
Confusing Belgium and Sri Lanka’s Case Studies
- Students often mix up Belgium’s successful model with Sri Lanka’s majoritarian policies.
- Tip: Create a comparison table to clearly differentiate between the two.
Not Understanding Different Forms of Power Sharing
- Many students memorize the types of power sharing (horizontal, vertical, among communities, among political groups) without understanding them.
- Tip: Learn with examples (e.g., Horizontal power sharing = Judiciary, Executive, Legislature).
Overlooking the Role of Community Government in Belgium
- The Community Government in Belgium is often ignored, leading to incorrect answers.
- Tip: Remember that it protects cultural and linguistic rights of communities.
Writing Incomplete Answers in Case-Based Questions
- Students tend to write one-line answers for case-based questions, leading to lost marks.
- Tip: Read the case carefully and provide detailed explanations with relevant examples.
Not Practicing Map or Diagram-Based Questions
- Some students ignore flowcharts and diagrams, which can help in better retention.
- Tip: Practice mind maps or flowcharts to remember key concepts quickly.
Creative Ways to Make Notes for Power Sharing Ch 1 Class 10
One important practice to include in your board exam prep is to make your own handwritten notes. Here’s how you can make them.
1. Mind Maps
- Draw a central bubble labeled "Power Sharing" and branch out into:
- Types of Power Sharing (Horizontal, Vertical, Social, Political)
- Belgium vs. Sri Lanka (Differences)
- Why Power Sharing is Important?
- Use arrows and simple drawings for better understanding.
2. Comparison Table
Feature |
Belgium |
Sri Lanka |
Ethnic Groups |
Dutch (59%), French (40%) |
Sinhalese (74%), Tamils (18%) |
Power Sharing |
Shared among all communities |
Majoritarian rule by Sinhalese |
Outcome |
Stability and peace |
Civil war and conflicts |
Tip: This helps in quick revision before exams!
3. Flashcards
- Write important terms or questions on one side and their answers on the other.
- Example:
Q: What is horizontal power sharing?
A: Power shared among different organs (Legislature, Executive, Judiciary).
Tip: Shuffle and quiz yourself for better recall!
4. Mnemonic Tricks
- To remember the Types of Power Sharing, use: H.V.C.P.
H - Horizontal (Legislature, Executive, Judiciary)
V - Vertical (Central, State, Local)
C - Community (Ethnic/Linguistic groups)
P - Political (Parties, pressure groups)
Conclusion
As students of civics, understanding power sharing helps in grasping the importance of inclusivity and prudence in governance. The chapter serves as a valuable lesson on the importance of embracing diversity within democratic frameworks, ensuring peace, stability, and equality for all citizens. Happy learning!
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Why is power sharing important in a democracy?
Ans. Power sharing is important in a democracy because it reduces conflicts, promotes social harmony, and ensures that all groups in society have a voice. It helps to maintain political stability and protects the interests of minority groups, making governance more inclusive and fair.
Q2. What are the two main reasons for power sharing in a democratic country?
Ans. The two main reasons are:
Prudential Reason: Power sharing prevents social conflicts and ensures political stability.
Moral Reason: It upholds the democratic principle of respecting every group’s voice in decision-making.
Q3. How did Belgium and Sri Lanka handle ethnic diversity differently?
Ans. Belgium handled ethnic diversity by implementing power-sharing arrangements that included all communities in governance, resulting in stability and harmony.
Sri Lanka took a majoritarian approach that favoured the Sinhalese majority, leading to conflicts and civil war due to the exclusion of the Tamil minority.
Q4. What are the different forms of power sharing in democracies?
Ans. The forms of power sharing include:
- Horizontal Power Sharing (among branches like the executive, legislature, and judiciary)
- Vertical Power Sharing (across central, state, and local levels)
- Power Sharing Among Social Groups (to protect minority rights)
- Power Sharing Among Political Parties and Pressure Groups (involving coalitions and multiparty systems).
Q5. What lessons can be learned from the power-sharing examples of Belgium and Sri Lanka?
Ans. Belgium shows that a balanced, inclusive approach to power sharing can bring stability and peace. Sri Lanka’s example demonstrates that ignoring the needs of minority groups can lead to severe conflict, highlighting the importance of inclusive governance in maintaining harmony within a nation.
